{"id":3466,"date":"2024-05-17T12:41:07","date_gmt":"2024-05-17T12:41:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.khanglobalstudies.com\/blog\/?p=3466"},"modified":"2024-05-17T12:41:15","modified_gmt":"2024-05-17T12:41:15","slug":"simon-commission","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.khanglobalstudies.com\/blog\/simon-commission\/","title":{"rendered":"Simon Commission: History, Boycott, Impact and Response"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

The Simon Commission, officially known as the Indian Statutory Commission<\/strong>, was a group of seven members led by Sir John Simon. Formed by the British government, its purpose was to investigate the reasons behind the inadequate functioning of India\u2019s constitutional changes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In 1928, the Simon Commission arrived in British India to evaluate how to enhance the country\u2019s constitution. Among its members was Clement Attlee, who later became the leader of the Labour Party and a strong advocate for Indian self-governance. This article delves into the Simon Commission Report of 1927<\/strong>, its historical context, and its impact on India.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n
\ud83d\ude80 Click here to get more information about other government exams\ud83d\udcd6 like UPSC and State PSC, SSC, Defence, Police, Banking etc.<\/strong><\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

Simon Commission<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The Simon Commission, also referred to as the Indian Statutory Commission, was tasked with reviewing proposed legal changes in India. This initiative was linked to the Government of India Act of 1919<\/strong>, which established India’s legislative framework. Sir John Simon was responsible for assembling the commission’s members.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The absence of Indian representatives on the commission led to widespread criticism and non-cooperation from the Indian National Congress<\/strong> and other Indian political organizations. Understanding the Simon Commission is crucial for those studying Modern Indian History<\/strong> for government exams. This article offers an in-depth look at the Simon Commission.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What is the Simon Commission?<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

In 1928, the Simon Commission, led by Sir John Simon and comprising seven Members of Parliament, came to India to scrutinize and recommend changes to the laws and governance structure of British India, which was then the British Empire’s largest and most vital colony.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

History of the Simon Commission<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

The Government of India Act of 1919 introduced the Dyarchy system and proposed a commission to review constitutional changes after a decade. On November 8, 1927<\/strong>, the British government, under Prime Minister Stanley Baldwin<\/strong>, established the Simon Commission. This commission, known as the Indian Statutory Commission, was composed entirely of British members, which sparked criticism due to the lack of Indian inclusion.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The primary objective of the Simon Commission was to advise the British government on constitutional reforms in British India. Anticipating a possible electoral defeat, the conservative British government advanced the commission’s formation to 1927, two years earlier than planned.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Lord Birkenhead<\/strong>, the Secretary of State for India, doubted the ability of Indians to devise a broadly accepted plan for constitutional reforms. His scepticism was a key factor in the creation of the Simon Commission in 1927.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Reaction of Indians to the Simon Commission<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

In 1927, the exclusion of Indians from a special commission sparked widespread discontent. During a meeting in Madras, the Congress Party resolved to boycott the commission. Similarly, the Muslim League, led by M.A. Jinnah<\/strong>, decided against participating. However, some members, such as Muhammad Shafi, supported the government\u2019s initiative.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Justice Party in southern India also sided with the government. When the Simon Commission arrived in February 1928, it faced massive protests nationwide. People expressed their displeasure through strikes, black flag demonstrations, and chants of “Simon go back.”<\/p>\n\n\n\n

To quell the protests, the police resorted to force, including lathi charges, even against respected leaders like Pandit Nehru. In Lahore, Lala Lajpat Rai<\/strong>, who was leading an anti-Simon Commission demonstration, was severely injured by police action and tragically died later that year.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

During this period, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar<\/strong> submitted a report on behalf of the Bahishkrit Hitkarini Sabha<\/strong>, addressing the education of oppressed classes in the Bombay Presidency.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Boycott of the Simon Commission<\/strong><\/h4>\n\n\n\n

The formation of the Simon Commission to review the impact of constitutional changes in India caused widespread disappointment, as it consisted solely of British members, ignoring Indian representation. This led to protests and strong criticism.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

At a meeting in Madras in 1927, the Congress Party decided to boycott the commission. Muhammad Ali Jinnah’s Muslim League also refused to participate and criticized the commission. However, the Justice Party in southern India supported the government on this issue.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

When the commission arrived in India, it was met with widespread protests, strikes, and black flag demonstrations, accompanied by chants of “Simon, go back”.<\/strong> The authorities responded with force, including lathi charges, leading to violent clashes with prominent leaders such as Lala Lajpat Rai and Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Lala Lajpat Rai, a revered leader from Punjab, was critically injured during a lathi charge and subsequently died on November 17, 1928. Additionally, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar<\/a><\/strong> presented a report to the Bahishkrit Hitkarini Sabha<\/strong>, emphasizing the importance of educating marginalized groups in the Bombay Presidency.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Simon Commission Recommendations<\/strong><\/h4>\n\n\n\n

The Simon Commission report, divided into two sections, included several major recommendations:<\/p>\n\n\n\n